很多雅思考生一直想要劍橋雅思10寫作資料，但是卻總是找不到，現在烤鴨不用擔心了，上海新航道雅思小編為大家馬上帶來關于劍橋雅思11寫作范文Test1Task2的內容，供大家參考。

  劍橋雅思11Test1作文Task2題目：

  Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.

  To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

  Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

  劍橋雅思11Test1作文Task2范文

  It is perhaps the long-disturbing traffic issue that drives governments all over the globe to make great efforts in establishing or improving their traffic system. Nevertheless, I still cannot be enrolled in the camp that claims it is wise to construct railway rather than roads. (45 words)

  Undoubtedly, the railway construction, in a way, can be deemed as a win-win program for both the country and its citizens. After all, compared with other types of transportation, the transporting load of railage in a unit time is the largest and it is also the fastest approach of conveyance on land. Simultaneously, due to its strikingly strong operating system in running, it can scarcely entail any congestion. Evidently, it is advantageous to implement the plan referred to railway establishment. (80 words)

  Rather, whether it is the rail or the road, the erection is in requirement of many other comprehensive elements, for example the scale of city development, the extent of population mobility, the condition of geographical surroundings and so forth. For those world-famous metropolis, like New York or Shanghai, both railroad and traffic-way are key in the city function. For one thing, major cities need to receive populations nationwide and even worldwide; thereby, sufficient convenience must be provided by perfect train system. Meanwhile, residents living in such a big city are supposed to be ensure with a relatively pleasant road-travel condition. However, for those middle-sized cities or towns，situations should differ according to different complex consideration. With the help of proper geography and adequate budgets, building railway should not be a malfeasance. Instead, it tends to introduce numerous opportunities for further development. Unfortunately, it seems not make sense for cities of limited scale to set up extensive railway, where, there are neither too much immigrating population nor too large population density after all. 

  Additionally, do forget that along with the above sweeteners, rail service signifies a higher financial investment, a larger amount of resources as well as a much more complicated running system, all of which require a considerable number of time and budget. Besides, during the construction process, more severe traffic congestion is inevitable, unless the authorities can avoid these visible or potential issues and otherwise a blind construction of railway cannot be a wise choice.

  Overall, decision of whether to build should not be arbitrary, while it must be in accordance with laws of civil development.

  也許是交通問題已經困擾世界各國人民太久了，所以各國政府都紛紛在交通建設和改善方面做出了不小的努力。但是對于政府花錢建設更多的鐵路而不是公路這樣的觀點，我本人表示不能完全贊成。

  首先不得不承認，建設鐵路某種程度上是一件利國利民的事情。畢竟與其他運輸方式相比，鐵路運輸的單位時間內運載量是最大的，也是陸運速度最快的一種方式，同時由于鐵路運輸是依靠強大的運作系統來控制運行的，所以鐵路運輸幾乎不會產生交通擁堵的問題。顯然事實鐵路建設是件有益的事情。

  但是，不管是鐵路建設還是公路建設應該取決于很多綜合因素，比如城市發展規模，人口流動幅度，地址環境情況等等。對于世界級大都市來說，顯然公路和鐵路都扮演中同樣重要的角色，一方面大城市要接納來自全國各地甚至世界各地的人口，所以在鐵路方面一定要提供足夠的便利。同時在這樣的大城市生活的人，在日常出行方面也應該有一定的保障，所以公路建設也必不可少。相反，對于中等發達城市來說，具體情況也應該具體分析，如果地理條件和資金條件都允許的情況下， 建設鐵路并不是壞事，反而能給當地帶來更多的發展機會。但是如果是規模比較小的城市，過多建設鐵路顯然意義并不大，畢竟外來人口不多，或者人口流動密度不大。

  此外，人們似乎忽視了鐵路運輸在帶來便利的同時，也意味著更高的投資成本和更多的資源投入和更復雜的運行系統的建立，這些都需要花費相當多的時間和財政預算。在鐵路建設過程中難免會造成更為嚴重的交通問題，除非政府能比較合理地規避這些潛在問題，否則盲目修建鐵路絕對不是明智之選。

  總而言之，到底是建鐵路還是建公路不能武斷地做決定，還是應該順應城市發展規律。

  這個暑期，來新航道上海雅思培訓班 ，我們給考生最大的保障

  簽訂協議，承諾不過重修，只有頂尖的雅思培訓學校，才敢做出如此承諾!

  自信，源于上海新航道極致完善的雅思培訓體系

  13年來1000+資深講師、自主研發教材、個性化教學，

  讓100W+學子從新航道成功留學海外名校。